Showing posts with label Catholic Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic Church. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 July 2007

Is Atheism a more Moral Position than Theism

Christopher Hitchens, freelance journalist and writer for magazines like Slate and Vanity Fair and author of the book, 'God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything' - made the point that: 'children do not have to be taught the Golden Rule' (treat others as you want to be treated). Now, children may need a friendly reminder, now and again, but for the most part, the Golden Rule is innate in us.

Hitchens went on to say, 'why do many of us voluntarily give blood, religious or not, not only that, we positively enjoy knowing we are helping out a fellow human being.

Most atheists tend to hold that a baby is born innocent and if treated with love and respect will naturally grow up, to love and respect others. Religion and most positively the three major monotheism's start from the opposite premise, we are born innately wicked and thus, a set of religious dogmas has to be followed, to hold that 'innate' evil in check. It is not surprising that many children who grew up in strict Catholic households, have had their minds poisoned with this vile nonsense and it had a devastating effect on their entire lives, to the point where many of them, were so inculcated with the belief in sin on a deep subconscious level, that they grew up, with the incapacity to hold on to a loving relationship. Much the same can be said, for many Muslims today.

But what is important to understand, is that morality has nothing to do with religion or atheism, morality is not a synonym for either atheism or religion. Our morality comes out of our humanity as first cause. This is why the majority of moderate theists, are good and by the same token, so are atheists. Note, I didn't say 'moderate' atheists, the reason for that, is that I see no evidence for atheist extremism and thus the term moderate atheist would be 'null and void' ...The same cannot be said for religion of course. there is plenty of ordinary and extra ordinary violence, created in the name of religion. That is why I used the qualifier, moderate religion, as apposed to extreme.

It seems to be the case, that as long as one is bought up in a loving household, or at the very least, a relatively loving one, as compared to the majority, then that in itself, is enough for one to grow up, with an innate sense of responsibility, in being a reasonable and moral human being... That is all it takes.

Now atheists can of course do criminal things. But what one cannot do of course, is find a causal link between atheism and the criminal act perpetrated. How often have you heard stories in the media of people being convicted of crimes, which they perpetrated, directly because of their atheism, I cannot personally think of even one of the top of my head. Now, there may well be the occasional exception of someone committing a crime, directly because of their atheism, but the point is that such incidence, if they do occur, must be very rare and I challenge anyone to point to any modern or past crime that was directly caused by atheism...

I'm sure many theists will now be shouting at the computer screen, and saying 'Stalin' and 'Hitler' ...This of course is a 'straw man'. No historian is seriously blaming atheism for Hitler or Stalin. Indeed, at the Nuremberg trial, after the Second World War, nobody in the court room, mentioned atheism as a cause for the Nazis behavior... The same cannot be said for religion of course. You can find stories of crimes in the media, that are only caused because of religion and without religion as a direct link, such crimes would never have happened.

It should also be noted, that there are statistically, far more religious people in prison than there are atheists, this is a statistical fact. But even here, a point is being missed. One could of course say that most of the religious people in prison, did not commit their crimes, because of the religion, but of course the same applies to the atheist inmates too. But one can say one thing for certain, the meta analysis, between the statistical numbers, suggests that the only reason that there are statistically more theist prisoners than atheist is exactly because of religion.

I said earlier, that morality really has nothing to do with religion or atheism. Well I now want to add a qualifier so this makes a little more sense. Now, although atheism does not directly make someone a more moral person than 'some' theists, there does seem to be an indirect reason why 'most' atheists are more moral than 'some' theists. The reason quite simply seems to be, that an atheist naturally, has not got the excess 'baggage' of mysticism beclouding their mind, which could possibly lead them into committing acts, which most individuals would consider to be less than human. In many such cases, such acts of violence are committed only because of a literal interpretation of scripture or they were, indirectly advised to commit such acts by priests of the Church.

So, the final point is that, humanity is naturally moral and when someone is behaving immorally, our human nature leads us to look for reasons. The simple fact is and I am absolutely convinced of this, if religion was taken out of the World, it would be a safer and more moral place to live in. It is only the excuse of religious dictates, that leads to crimes against humanity, that otherwise would not occur. Religion is often the catalyst, that allows for the most heinous crimes, including, suicide bombing, beheading, the severing of limbs and all kinds of torture. Now, most of these atrocities today, are of course done in the name of Islam and not Christianity or Judaism.... But, as long as religion remains a force in the world, then it always has the potential to lead to the worst in us and cut us of from our innate humanity.




How I make money from this article and how you can make money too. Please Click here to email me! Please do not remove 'permission' from body of email.

* Ultimate Registry Cleaner
o Put an end to slow bootups & computer problems, with the world's leading registry cleaner!

Tuesday, 10 July 2007

Freedom is Never Truly Free

Freedom is undoubtedly not free. The freest civilizations in the World, have arrived at that freedom, through a long history of struggle. It is also, an obvious fact that some countries are freer than others. It is a fact of history, that many individuals have had to fight for their freedom. It is also a fact that freedom once gained, can be quickly lost.

An example of the struggle for freedom from history, was the Battle of Lepanto of 1571. This was the last time in history, that both the Christian Church and the Catholic Church came together in a common struggle.

The struggle was against the Islamic forces of the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman State had designs on what it called, infinite expansion. Its goal was to convert, enslave or kill and in doing so, expand its empire. Muslims were indoctrinated with the belief, that they are duty bound to 'expand the domain of peace'.

The coming together of Christians and catholics to defeat a common enemy, was done under the banner of the 'Christian Coalition'. The Battle of Lepanto was the beginning of the end for the Ottoman Empire and is just one example of the struggle to defend against its expansion... the Ottoman forces were eventually, utterly defeated and the expansion of the Ottoman Empire was ultimately halted and eventually ousted and pushed back to the Middle East.

While their are tyrants in the World, who believe they have the right to enslave and kill others, for the sake of expanding their own brand of tyranny, while this is the case, then in many parts of the World, freedom will have to be fought for, and in many cases, where there is freedom, or at least a degree of it, there will be struggles to hold onto it.

Another example for the struggle against tyranny and in the defense of freedom: In 1778, when America was still young and barely a country; the Barbary States of the States of the Ottoman Empire and North Africa where kidnapping American sailors, from ships and taking them into slavery. It has been estimated that about 1.5 million Americans and Europeans were taken into slavery between 1750 and 1815. Jefferson and Adams visited Tripoli’s ambassador to London in March 1785...

Jefferson asked the question of the ambassador: "Why do you do this to us, we have never had a quarrel with the Muslim World, we were not in the Crusades, or the War in Spain?" - The ambassador replied: "Because the Koran, gives us the permission to do so, because you are infidels". Jefferson's reply was swift and aggressive... He said, "very well, I will send a navy to utterly crush your State". That is exactly what Jefferson did.

In more recent History, there was of course the struggle for freedom against the tyranny of the Nazis. Indeed, looking through history, it seems to be scattered with periodic wars, started by dictators, and defended against by those who love their freedom.

Islamic fundamentalism, is once again raising its ugly head. Islamic fascists, once again are fighting a terror battle, to 'expand the domain of peace'. If they were to succeed, then everyone of us, who does not convert to 'true Islam', will be defeated and put to death, or into slavery.

So the answer is no, freedom is never truly free. Freedom has to be fought for, and the cost is often very high. But, the cost of doing nothing, in defense of our freedom, would be the highest price of all. It would be the collapse of western democracy as we know it.


Reference(s):
Jefferson Versus the Muslim Pirates, Christopher Hitchens
Infidels by Andrew Wheatcroft (published by Penguin books).




How I make money from this article and how you can make money too. Please Click here to email me! Please do not remove 'permission' from body of email.

* Stop Smoking in 28 Days
o Discover how to kick the habit in under a month, with Melvin G. Power!